My research interests cover a variety of topics both in philosophy and history of the natural sciences. Starting with my PhD thesis (2004), I devoted some studies to Ernst Mach’s philosophy and the idea of description in the physical sciences. In this framework I also approached the work of Heinrich Hertz. From time to time, a certain curiosity and the love for poetry and novels encourages me to deal with a sort of comparative research between science and literature. As regards my most recent activity, I am working on a book about Ruggiero Boscovich’s natural philosophy, which should result from a series of articles I am publishing.
My research also deals with some structural aspects of the scientific enterprise, which I consider from a historical-epistemological perspective. In particular I directed my attention to the concept of shared discovery – for cases in which priority questions are not particularly relevant, collaboration is more important than competition, researchers are not mutually independent of each other, and resistance to new findings is so marginal that practically plays no role. I am currently exploring the concept of epistemic constraints – i.e. guiding ideas and pracitces for the scientific research. Rooted in historical development, they tell us what is to be known (and what is not: so they entail both a positive and a negative heuristic) and how is to be known what is to be known (so they entail norms).
In this page I list some papers (PowerPoint documents saved as PDF files) I discussed in conferences and talks as well as articles which are already published or to be published. All the topics involved are eligible for potential BA or MA theses by students.